Using short-term vacation rentals (STVRs)—available through sites like Airbnb, VRBO, and Booking.com—travelers are searching for exciting and affordable lodging. These rentals range from guest rooms to complete residences and may be more affordable than a comparable-sized hotel room.
However, while STVRs benefit both guests and hosts, they may present some issues for communities. In many states, this has led legislators to make new regulations. Public opinion toward these rentals continues to shift, with some states welcoming them while others resisting them. Let’s see where things stand now and how state laws differ.
The Growth of STVRs
STVRs are nothing new, but Airbnb and VRBO revolutionized the space. They made it simple for homeowners to rent out their houses and for visitors to find cheap hotel alternatives. For hosts, it was a source of income. In towns, it meant more tourists and more dollars in local stores.
But as the demand for short-term rentals increased, so did the worry. Locals say a tsunami of tourists is raising the cost of living, limiting the availability of permanent rentals, and reshaping communities (not always in a positive way). Cities and states responded with various policies that sought to satisfy these fears, which produced an overlapping array of rules throughout the U.S.
Different States, Different Rules
STVRs are regulated differently from state to state and even from cities in different counties. Some states, like Florida, have been more liberal with short-term rentals. Others, like Hawaii and California, are much stricter. Let’s see how the rules differ for a couple of key states.
Florida: A Tourist Haven
Vacationers have loved Florida for decades, flocking to Miami, Orlando, and the Florida Keys. As a result, the state has opened up short-term rentals. Florida law generally prohibits local governments from passing overly harsh laws on STVRs, so homeowners in most areas of the state don’t have much of a barrier to renting out their property.
Nevertheless, it’s not entirely the responsibility of individual cities and counties to decide how STVRs are handled. Miami Beach, for example, has enforced specific rules with steep penalties if you break them.
Florida also takes an inclusive approach to property tax assessments, with short-term rental properties being taxed similarly to other income-generating properties. In most cases, properties used primarily for vacation rentals are assessed at commercial rates, which are higher than residential rates. However, homeowners who rent out their primary residence for only part of the year can sometimes maintain a homestead exemption, reducing their tax burden. This allows some flexibility for occasional hosts but ensures that commercial operators contribute more to local tax revenues.
Overall, the sentiment toward STVRs in Florida is better, where tourism is a substantial part of the local economy. Owners love the supplementary income, and visitors have no shortage of housing options for a short-term break. Still, some neighborhood residents who complain of noise, traffic, and overcrowding have advocated for increased enforcement.
Hawaii: A Balancing Act
Steady-flowing STVRs have also proliferated in Hawaii, an island that is one of the most beautiful and exotic places in the U.S. However, the state’s relationship with these rentals is less straightforward. Hawaii has a lot of tourists, many of whom are looking for rentals that are cheaper than luxury hotels. However, a lot of residents also think STVRs are making it difficult for locals to afford housing. There are also complaints of environmental degradation and over-tourism.
In response, Hawaii passed several laws to control the industry. For instance, Oahu (including Honolulu) limits the territory where you may host a short-term rental and requires hosts to register. Maui followed suit, too, with owners being asked to remain on the premises if they are renting out a property for less than 180 days. These restrictions were designed to help the local community, but they've also eroded the vacation rental supply. This lack of rentable places frustrates both hosts and visitors.
Additionally, property taxes in Hawaii vary by county and are influenced by whether a property is used as a primary residence, rented to tourists, or owned by a non-resident. Non-residents and short-term vacation rental properties (STVRs) are taxed at the full rate, while primary home residents receive significant exemptions. The exemption increases with the homeowner’s age, which helps local retirees maintain affordability in an otherwise high-cost environment. This tiered tax structure reflects Hawaii's effort to discourage speculative investment and prioritize housing for residents.
Arizona: A State of Freedom
Arizona is one of the most STVR-friendly states in the country. In 2016, the state passed an ordinance that forbids municipalities from explicitly banning short-term rentals. This has made Arizona (specifically Scottsdale and Sedona) one of the most attractive vacation rental destinations.
Arizona's property tax system also supports STVRs, as the state maintains relatively low property tax rates compared to others. Most short-term rental properties are taxed at the same rate as residential properties unless the property is explicitly classified as a business. This classification depends on how extensively the property is rented. In cases where the property generates significant income, local tax assessors may reclassify it, leading to higher tax rates. However, this typically happens only with large-scale or professionally managed rentals, ensuring smaller hosts aren’t overly burdened.
But there has been some resistance to STVRs, even in Arizona. As properties were converted into short-term rentals, local communities started worrying about the effects on the area. Reactions to complaints about party houses, noise, and the commodification of private spaces generated new pressure to govern STVR management. Scottsdale, for instance, recently enacted rules for nuisances (including noise and trash) that lower the troubles and do not require bans.
While Arizona has been one of the better states for short-term rentals in general, this might change if problems continue.
California: Restricting Rentals
California is another tale. As one of the biggest tourist destinations in the US, it has thousands of STVRs. But it’s also one of the most closely regulated short-term rental states. Cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco have tough laws, especially in tourist areas.
In Los Angeles, hosts have to register their properties, and there are strict regulations on how many days a year a home is rentable. San Francisco goes even further, allowing rentals only if the owner is also in the house. Short-term rentals may not exceed 90 days in a year if the host isn’t around.
These regulations reflect an increasing fear of housing depletion. With the cost of living already skyrocketing and the state experiencing a housing crisis, some claim that temporary rentals are removing units available for permanent residents. Thus, the state has had a stronger negative opinion of STVRs than most others.
In Closing
Just as the market for short-term vacation rentals is booming, so is the controversy about their effects. Some states—including Florida and Arizona—are adopting STVRs with open arms. They view them as a tourism driver and economic generator. Other states, like Hawaii and California, are more cautious. They are concerned about the long-term impact on residents and are more willing to adopt regulations to address housing issues.
The bottom line is that attitudes toward short-term rentals are changing, and communities and governments must decide how to serve tourists while still maintaining the local quality of life. Whether this shift continues as more regulations are passed and enforced or softens as the market gets more comfortable remains to be seen.
Important Disclosures:
Content in this material is for educational and general information only and not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual.
This article was prepared by WriterAccess.
LPL Tracking #669992
